Kellyisms aka “stupid things I say to get out of doing something illegal or unethical.
1.“The website with the stolen Federal Court Seal was done merely as a Mosaic” After being warned by Federal Judge of the offenses of abusing the Court Seal. Charges and complaint filed in US Court and State Bar.
August 8, 2010 court transcript. (huh?)
2. “I only put up a web site on the Defendant to manage the case and free it from Spam”
October 2010 Declaration (WTF? You are a paid pro spam lobbyist) http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/26184891/vp/40862269#40862269
From Kelly’s Linked In Profile:
Has served as in-house and outside general counsel for an array of entertainment and technology companies, including ValueClick, ETM Entertainment Network, Hi-Speed Media and SpeedyClick.com. “Served as in PAST TENSE.
3. “In opposing these internet and green tech initiatives, the GOP is being pro-“special interest”, not pro-business*. While they will attempt to obscure this important debate with political buzz words” (political buzz words like “mosaic” or “tweeking on a lark”)
from Huffington Report October 2009 (P.S. Huffington Post does not PAY their contributing columnists)
4. “[It is] grievously hurtful to our society when vilification becomes an accepted form of political debate [or when] vengeance becomes more desirable than vindication [and personal attacks] drown out the quiet logic of serious debate” yet- launched BushLies.net in January 2003.?) P.S. Bush Lies. net ordered taken down because of defamation and vilification. also is a contributing author to Big Bush Lies: 20 Essays and a List of the 50 Most Telling Lies of George W. Bush (RiverWood Books 2004). Batman – Takes one to know one, YOU are all about vengeance and making up drama to keep yourself front and center. Batman is also a sore loser.
From Huffington Post November 2009 (what do you all expect from a free contribution?)
5. Political Analyst and Commentary for over 30 years (never has run for office)
author of "President Bush: The False Prophet of the Christian Right" which appears in Big Bush Lies (RiverWood Books 2004). “For example, under President Bush civil citations to polluters dropped nearly sixty percent which may contribute to an increase in the estimated 700,000 hospital admissions and 100,000 premature deaths caused by air pollution each year.” (Batman what is your source? Make false claims and stats but no supporting documentation-did you pull this out of your ass?) Batman, it is more than likely Obama will lose in 2012 and so will the Democrats as a whole. Sorry, but don’t take it out on Republicans and pull your hissie fits, or attack’s someone’s family.
From the Democratic Underground November 2004
6. “he has been recognized for an "entertaining and compelling mix of bite, intelligence and humor" and "read[ing] the Bush administration like a book." He has provided political analysis and insight to television, radio and print media ranging from KABC to the Washington Times drawing upon his 30” (recognized by WHO? Please cite your source)
From All American Speakers (Batman you speak poorly and need some speech lessons- work on the voice and diction/tone it is horrid listening to you is worse than my kid crying) Besides they look for handsome men not crème puff looking men. But that is a nice wedding ring cover.
All American Speakers is a "buyers agent" and exclusively represents talent buyers looking to secure celebrities and speakers for personal appearances, speaking engagements, corporate entertainment, private events, public relations campaigns, promotions or commercials.
7. “Today Show has brief interview of me in puff segment on spambulance chaser Dan Balsam”
“Quoted in AP profile of spamigator Dan Balsam”
“More interview clips (Today and CBS-SF) in Media Coverage and the Balsam Chronicles”
From Batman’s Twitter Account (January 2011) Batman, you don’t get it -America is on the side of the spam fighter not the spam lobbyist. See #2 above. The California anti-spam law is very clear. *We thought you said it was the Republicans that only care about big business? (See #3 Batmanism) Careful your nose is growing so much that Batman mask won’t fit.
8. “Contributor to the Journal of Internet Law and is a frequent speaker on internet law at conferences across North America. His recent presentations include the following: Who's Nibbling at My Cookie, SXSW Interactive (March 16, 2010)
Essentials Of Cyberspace Law: User Generated Content, Privacy and Online Advertising, California Bar Business Law Section Essentials Webinar Series (January 27, 2010)”
From another law firm’s website where Batman works for extra bucks (Can you please validate any proposals you have made to California or Federal law?) thank you. We wait your reply. The truth is you never have any testimony before Congress on the Internet, you are small potatoes.
9. “Intelligent, shrewd, funny, but still able to be cold and calculating when he needs to, as all truly excellent lawyers need to be.” (description by a client with no name)
From “What About Paris? News and ideas daily for serving clients, customers, business and law globally. Under “There’s a Recession”? (June 2010) Batman you are cold and calculating but so predictable. It’s all about you, you, you.
10. “He really seems to be trying to twist things for a buck,” says XXX a defense lawyer who has become Balsam’s arch nemesis over the years in the rough-and-tumble litigation niche that has sprung up around spam.
“There is nothing wrong per se with being an anti-spam crusader,” said XXX, who has sued Balsam twice for allegedly violating confidentiality terms in settlement agreements. “But Dan abuses the processes by using small claims court.” (Batman under $5,000 is considered small claims court, sorry but it is the law. Don’t need to have sour grapes because Dan has won over 50 cases against your Spam Marketing buddies)
From News Tribune, MSNBC, NBC, CBS, CNN and other news 12/10
: http://www.thenewstribune.com/2010/12/29/1481428/dan-hates-spam-man-does-he-hate.html#ixzz1A0BdSZqc
11. “I did it on a lark to tweek him” XXX explained why he cybersquatted on someone’s blog. Gee sounds like the only Freedom of Speech Batman wants to protect is his OWN speech and what he choses or is PAID to say.
Celebrity career in Law will never happen, except in your mind Batman.
From the top 5 Internet Lawyers in the world, too bad you are at the bottom 20
Remember I have clout and who I know.
Showing posts with label Bennet Kelley is trying to be a celebrity attorney. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bennet Kelley is trying to be a celebrity attorney. Show all posts
Friday, February 17, 2012
Tuesday, November 15, 2011
Vanessa Kachadurian - Freedom of speech and truth remain- FALSE VICTORY
Mr. Bennet Kelley a self-professed "Internet Attorney" is claiming "victory" in a case he won NO award in and didn't succeed in squashing the truth or Freedom of Speech. Do we need to remind Mr. Kelley about the lies and mistruths in his flimsy Complaint that didn't make it past mediation? Or how you had to amend the complaint many times, because it had no legal theory. In the end you had no where to go with it and your client errors in thinking that anyone in the Republic of Armenia would side with Plaintiff over me, or any other of our citizens. Labeling me a "Cyber Attacker" is libelous and I have challenged you to debate me on Truth vs. Cyber Attacks any time, I will even grace your internet radio show with my perspective and that of an average citizen.
As the mediation report said.......anyone can sue for anything if they want to, or if Plaintiff has the money to spend on an ambulance chaser like you. The other fact is, your case was past over by many attorneys in Fresno before a law firm that is NOW closed after 50 years accepted it. "Small Victory" no not at all, you don't control the law in Armenia and the other countries, that is where the truth is being exposed. Even your client's money won't change the truth, all $1.3 million that has been earned the last 4 years from buying and selling children.
Perhaps we should also remind everyone how you wrongfully accused me of trying to harm you. All I ever did was tell you to leave my family alone (a reasonable request)that you turned into a bad circus, it isn't my fault your client lied to you about the facts and you were embarassed. You also leave out the part how you stole the federal court seal and my photo and ran it on a blog together. Your ethics is laughable and your a.m. radio show and Huffington blog (neither are paid venues) are stupid and self-promoting. As the other attorney's call you "a deceptive cheeky little monkey" I have also reported you to the Armenian Law Association in California and they are not happy with your ethnic slurs and as you put it "Tweeking on a Lark". Your antics are unethical and it's too bad your client doesn't file legal malpractice charges against you for destroying her case and abusing her reputation. Not to mention stealing over $100K in legal fees from your client and promising to destroy people who have an opinion or truthful substantiated proof of wrong doing. Surely, your client understands that everyone doesn't believe she is a savior of some sort.
Your client wins nothing and you win nothing in damages because you failed to prove this and failed to distinguish the multitude of reports from Brandeis University to Radio free Europe regarding irregular practices in adoption. One should ask why Mr. Kelley doesn't file flimsy lawsuits against the journalists or news companies? Why? Because he can't attack the truth, so he creates straw man arguments that amount to no more than fantasy writing by Kelley. So lets see here, $100K spent on legal fees and $85K reimbursed for legal fees by the insurance company. At the end of the day, you didn't squash the truth and never will.
Mr. Kelley also proceeded to attack my community with Ethnic Slurs and harass my family which precipitated a police report. All of which is sitting on the DA's office in Santa Monica, California. if you think you will win Mr. Kelley you are sadly mistaken, you only win with making a complete fool out of yourself especially when it was found that your complaint had errors and misinformation in it.
Remember Kelley you didn't do your due diligence and verify your client's remarks about "so called" clients and THE REAL reason they stopped their contract to adopt. Which if you recall had nothing to do with me or any other journalist, this was verified by a 3rd party who interviewed the 4 couples who cited "bad customer service" and other "inconsistancies" in the horrible and laughable written complaint that is being laughed at by every law professor on the west coast. Your embarassment after finding these facts were true were evident in your behavior toward me and resorting to personal attacks because you COULD NOT WIN A JUDGMENT.
Keep up the attacking Bennet, you are a low life sleeze only after attorney fees. Which your client paid you handsomely for. What was it that you were paid? Estimates by legal friends say it was $85-100K for legal fees? and what did I have to pay? .......ZERO. Kelley didn't succeed in doing what he set out to do, harm me financially and emotionally. So how much more did the Plaintiff pay you to straighten up her business reputation? You are a paid agitator and have done this for the Democratic party by attacking former President Bush (Bushlies.net) But attacking a solo citizen is unacceptable for your wealthy client. Your client is not a small business as you would have people believe, their IRS revenue reported is $1.3 million for the last 4 years. Adoption Agencies are not exactly without critics these days, as such they have dropped off by 52% the last 4 years for good reasons.
Here is the lie Kelley posted. If he wants to call it a “victory”, he can. Of course, you’re free to categorize it however you want. Plaintiffs easily incurred legal fees and costs in excess of $100k. The mediation alone probably cost them ten grand between attorneys’ fees, the mediator’s fee, hotels, and flights. Surely, Bennet walked away with more money to support his lackluster writing and speaking career. Do you really think bashing private citizens and aligning yourself with a group that is currently under FBI investigation is good for your reputation?
Mr. Kelley you will never stop freedom of speech and the truth, as this was explained to you by Judge Westerfield. Admittedly, your own client admits the arrest and the DISMISSAL BY the former employer, all known and substantiated facts. Again you misled everyone and your communication sucks, I think your own quote "do anything for a buck" suits you well. Your professors from back east would be very ashamed of your lousy tactics and infantile actions. You lose and you have to resort to personal attacks on children and 80 year olds.
Mr. Kelley professes to stand up for Freedom of Speech and applauds "Occupy Wall Street Movement". Unfortunately when it comes to lawyers and mercenaries, they will always side with the paying client as they are a paid mouthpiece puppet. No lawyer can be trusted, so we have to ask Mr. Kelley does he stand on the side of moral virtues or big business and greed? I think we know the answer. Also you profess to defend Spam, yet claim you added a website attacking me for spam filters (whatever that is suppose to mean- Everyone should realize Bennet has a magical way with word salads- after all he is a wanna be writer) Then fail to mention you were paid unsuccessfully by Spam Lobbyists, not to mention your former job as in house counsel for Value Click who have since "parted ways" with you. I understand your late father was an honorable DA in Rhode Island, too bad you have not filled his shoes.
P.S. THIS LATEST BLOG YOU POSTED ABOUT ME IS PROOF, OF YOUR VICIOUS PROSECUTION ATTEMPT AND VEXATOUS MALICIOUS LITIGATION. YOU LOSE AND ARE A LOSER.
Internet Law Center Announces Victory against Serial Cyber Defamer; Calls for Legislative Action
Internet Law Center Announces Victory against Serial Cyber Defamer;
Calls for Legislative Action
SANTA MONICA, CA–Nov. 15, 2011—The Internet Law Center, a law firm based in Santa Monica, California, announced today it had achieved a significant victory for its client Hopscotch Adoptions, Inc. (www.hopscotchadoptions.org) of High Point, North Carolina in a federal defamation action against Vanessa Kachadurian of Fresno, California, with an $85,000 settlement.
Hopscotch and its founder Robin Sizemore, filed suit against Kachadurian in federal court in Fresno in December 2009 in response to a vicious cyber-smear campaign that began in 2006. The plaintiffs were merely one of several adoption and educational institutions to be targeted for abuse by Kachadurian under multiple identities.
“It is a gutsy move for a small non-profit like Hopscotch to say ‘enough’ and take on someone like Kachadurian who can devastate a small business,” said Internet Law Center founder Bennet Kelley. This is especially true when, Kelley added, “cyber abuse often escalates online and leads to offline threats of violence in over one in four cases according to data compiled by WHO@ (www.haltabuse.org).”
“Small victories like these collectively send an important message that the internet is no longer the ‘Wild, Wild West’ and that you can and will be held accountable for your actions.”
Kelley noted, however, that “Kachadurian is part of a growing class of internet serial defamers who cause substantial economic and emotional harm to their victims and who have forced companies to spend millions on online reputation management to block and/or respond to such attacks.”
Kelley, who helped draft a primer on internet law for California policymakers, argued that lawmakers across the country should seriously assess whether their state’s defamation laws need to be updated to address these worst offenders.
Kelley added that, this may be a topic he explores in more depth in a future edition of Cyber Law and Business Report, a radio show he hosts that airs weekly on WebmasterRadio.fm.
About The Internet Law Center
The Internet Law Center (www.internetlawcenter.net) helps clients navigate and influence the evolving legal standards for the changing digital economy. The firm publishes the newsletter, Cyber Report, which won top prize at the Los Angeles Press Club’s 2011 Southern California Journalism Awards.
The firm was founded by Bennet Kelley, the former co-chair of the California Bar Cyberspace Committee, where he led the effort to publish Cyberspace Law and Policy: A Primer for State Policymakers.
Kelley is also Of Counsel to San Diego-based Hull McGuire PC (www.hullmcguire.com) and host of Cyber Law and Business Report which airs every Wednesday at 10AM Pacific/ 1PM Eastern on WebmasterRadio.fm. (www2.webmasterradio.fm/cyberlaw-and-business-report/).
Contact:
Bennet Kelley, (310) 452-0401
bkelley@internetlawcenter.net
As the mediation report said.......anyone can sue for anything if they want to, or if Plaintiff has the money to spend on an ambulance chaser like you. The other fact is, your case was past over by many attorneys in Fresno before a law firm that is NOW closed after 50 years accepted it. "Small Victory" no not at all, you don't control the law in Armenia and the other countries, that is where the truth is being exposed. Even your client's money won't change the truth, all $1.3 million that has been earned the last 4 years from buying and selling children.
Perhaps we should also remind everyone how you wrongfully accused me of trying to harm you. All I ever did was tell you to leave my family alone (a reasonable request)that you turned into a bad circus, it isn't my fault your client lied to you about the facts and you were embarassed. You also leave out the part how you stole the federal court seal and my photo and ran it on a blog together. Your ethics is laughable and your a.m. radio show and Huffington blog (neither are paid venues) are stupid and self-promoting. As the other attorney's call you "a deceptive cheeky little monkey" I have also reported you to the Armenian Law Association in California and they are not happy with your ethnic slurs and as you put it "Tweeking on a Lark". Your antics are unethical and it's too bad your client doesn't file legal malpractice charges against you for destroying her case and abusing her reputation. Not to mention stealing over $100K in legal fees from your client and promising to destroy people who have an opinion or truthful substantiated proof of wrong doing. Surely, your client understands that everyone doesn't believe she is a savior of some sort.
Your client wins nothing and you win nothing in damages because you failed to prove this and failed to distinguish the multitude of reports from Brandeis University to Radio free Europe regarding irregular practices in adoption. One should ask why Mr. Kelley doesn't file flimsy lawsuits against the journalists or news companies? Why? Because he can't attack the truth, so he creates straw man arguments that amount to no more than fantasy writing by Kelley. So lets see here, $100K spent on legal fees and $85K reimbursed for legal fees by the insurance company. At the end of the day, you didn't squash the truth and never will.
Mr. Kelley also proceeded to attack my community with Ethnic Slurs and harass my family which precipitated a police report. All of which is sitting on the DA's office in Santa Monica, California. if you think you will win Mr. Kelley you are sadly mistaken, you only win with making a complete fool out of yourself especially when it was found that your complaint had errors and misinformation in it.
Remember Kelley you didn't do your due diligence and verify your client's remarks about "so called" clients and THE REAL reason they stopped their contract to adopt. Which if you recall had nothing to do with me or any other journalist, this was verified by a 3rd party who interviewed the 4 couples who cited "bad customer service" and other "inconsistancies" in the horrible and laughable written complaint that is being laughed at by every law professor on the west coast. Your embarassment after finding these facts were true were evident in your behavior toward me and resorting to personal attacks because you COULD NOT WIN A JUDGMENT.
Keep up the attacking Bennet, you are a low life sleeze only after attorney fees. Which your client paid you handsomely for. What was it that you were paid? Estimates by legal friends say it was $85-100K for legal fees? and what did I have to pay? .......ZERO. Kelley didn't succeed in doing what he set out to do, harm me financially and emotionally. So how much more did the Plaintiff pay you to straighten up her business reputation? You are a paid agitator and have done this for the Democratic party by attacking former President Bush (Bushlies.net) But attacking a solo citizen is unacceptable for your wealthy client. Your client is not a small business as you would have people believe, their IRS revenue reported is $1.3 million for the last 4 years. Adoption Agencies are not exactly without critics these days, as such they have dropped off by 52% the last 4 years for good reasons.
Here is the lie Kelley posted. If he wants to call it a “victory”, he can. Of course, you’re free to categorize it however you want. Plaintiffs easily incurred legal fees and costs in excess of $100k. The mediation alone probably cost them ten grand between attorneys’ fees, the mediator’s fee, hotels, and flights. Surely, Bennet walked away with more money to support his lackluster writing and speaking career. Do you really think bashing private citizens and aligning yourself with a group that is currently under FBI investigation is good for your reputation?
Mr. Kelley you will never stop freedom of speech and the truth, as this was explained to you by Judge Westerfield. Admittedly, your own client admits the arrest and the DISMISSAL BY the former employer, all known and substantiated facts. Again you misled everyone and your communication sucks, I think your own quote "do anything for a buck" suits you well. Your professors from back east would be very ashamed of your lousy tactics and infantile actions. You lose and you have to resort to personal attacks on children and 80 year olds.
Mr. Kelley professes to stand up for Freedom of Speech and applauds "Occupy Wall Street Movement". Unfortunately when it comes to lawyers and mercenaries, they will always side with the paying client as they are a paid mouthpiece puppet. No lawyer can be trusted, so we have to ask Mr. Kelley does he stand on the side of moral virtues or big business and greed? I think we know the answer. Also you profess to defend Spam, yet claim you added a website attacking me for spam filters (whatever that is suppose to mean- Everyone should realize Bennet has a magical way with word salads- after all he is a wanna be writer) Then fail to mention you were paid unsuccessfully by Spam Lobbyists, not to mention your former job as in house counsel for Value Click who have since "parted ways" with you. I understand your late father was an honorable DA in Rhode Island, too bad you have not filled his shoes.
P.S. THIS LATEST BLOG YOU POSTED ABOUT ME IS PROOF, OF YOUR VICIOUS PROSECUTION ATTEMPT AND VEXATOUS MALICIOUS LITIGATION. YOU LOSE AND ARE A LOSER.
Internet Law Center Announces Victory against Serial Cyber Defamer; Calls for Legislative Action
Internet Law Center Announces Victory against Serial Cyber Defamer;
Calls for Legislative Action
SANTA MONICA, CA–Nov. 15, 2011—The Internet Law Center, a law firm based in Santa Monica, California, announced today it had achieved a significant victory for its client Hopscotch Adoptions, Inc. (www.hopscotchadoptions.org) of High Point, North Carolina in a federal defamation action against Vanessa Kachadurian of Fresno, California, with an $85,000 settlement.
Hopscotch and its founder Robin Sizemore, filed suit against Kachadurian in federal court in Fresno in December 2009 in response to a vicious cyber-smear campaign that began in 2006. The plaintiffs were merely one of several adoption and educational institutions to be targeted for abuse by Kachadurian under multiple identities.
“It is a gutsy move for a small non-profit like Hopscotch to say ‘enough’ and take on someone like Kachadurian who can devastate a small business,” said Internet Law Center founder Bennet Kelley. This is especially true when, Kelley added, “cyber abuse often escalates online and leads to offline threats of violence in over one in four cases according to data compiled by WHO@ (www.haltabuse.org).”
“Small victories like these collectively send an important message that the internet is no longer the ‘Wild, Wild West’ and that you can and will be held accountable for your actions.”
Kelley noted, however, that “Kachadurian is part of a growing class of internet serial defamers who cause substantial economic and emotional harm to their victims and who have forced companies to spend millions on online reputation management to block and/or respond to such attacks.”
Kelley, who helped draft a primer on internet law for California policymakers, argued that lawmakers across the country should seriously assess whether their state’s defamation laws need to be updated to address these worst offenders.
Kelley added that, this may be a topic he explores in more depth in a future edition of Cyber Law and Business Report, a radio show he hosts that airs weekly on WebmasterRadio.fm.
About The Internet Law Center
The Internet Law Center (www.internetlawcenter.net) helps clients navigate and influence the evolving legal standards for the changing digital economy. The firm publishes the newsletter, Cyber Report, which won top prize at the Los Angeles Press Club’s 2011 Southern California Journalism Awards.
The firm was founded by Bennet Kelley, the former co-chair of the California Bar Cyberspace Committee, where he led the effort to publish Cyberspace Law and Policy: A Primer for State Policymakers.
Kelley is also Of Counsel to San Diego-based Hull McGuire PC (www.hullmcguire.com) and host of Cyber Law and Business Report which airs every Wednesday at 10AM Pacific/ 1PM Eastern on WebmasterRadio.fm. (www2.webmasterradio.fm/cyberlaw-and-business-report/).
Contact:
Bennet Kelley, (310) 452-0401
bkelley@internetlawcenter.net
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)