Mr. Bennet Kelley a self-professed "Internet Attorney" is claiming "victory" in a case he won
NO award in and didn't succeed in squashing the truth or Freedom of Speech. Do we need to remind Mr. Kelley about the lies and mistruths in his flimsy Complaint that didn't make it past mediation? Or how you had to amend the complaint many times, because it had no legal theory. In the end you had no where to go with it and your client errors in thinking that anyone in the Republic of Armenia would side with Plaintiff over me, or any other of our citizens. Labeling me a "Cyber Attacker" is libelous and I have challenged you to debate me on Truth vs. Cyber Attacks any time, I will even grace your internet radio show with my perspective and that of an average citizen.
As the mediation report said.......
anyone can sue for anything if they want to, or if Plaintiff has the money to spend on an ambulance chaser like you. The other fact is, your case was past over by many attorneys in Fresno before a law firm that is NOW closed after 50 years accepted it. "Small Victory" no not at all, you don't control the law in Armenia and the other countries, that is where the truth is being exposed. Even your client's money won't change the truth, all $1.3 million that has been earned the last 4 years from buying and selling children.
Perhaps we should also remind everyone how you wrongfully accused me of trying to harm you. All I ever did was tell you to leave my family alone (a reasonable request)that you turned into a bad circus, it isn't my fault your client lied to you about the facts and you were embarassed. You also leave out the part how you stole the federal court seal and my photo and ran it on a blog together. Your ethics is laughable and your a.m. radio show and Huffington blog (neither are paid venues) are stupid and self-promoting. As the other attorney's call you "a deceptive cheeky little monkey" I have also reported you to the Armenian Law Association in California and they are not happy with your ethnic slurs and as you put it "Tweeking on a Lark". Your antics are unethical and it's too bad your client doesn't file legal malpractice charges against you for destroying her case and abusing her reputation. Not to mention stealing over $100K in legal fees from your client and promising to destroy people who have an opinion or truthful substantiated proof of wrong doing. Surely, your client understands that everyone doesn't believe she is a savior of some sort.
Your client wins
nothing and you win nothing in damages because you failed to prove this and failed to distinguish the multitude of reports from Brandeis University to Radio free Europe regarding irregular practices in adoption. One should ask why Mr. Kelley doesn't file flimsy lawsuits against the journalists or news companies? Why? Because he can't attack the truth, so he creates straw man arguments that amount to no more than fantasy writing by Kelley. So lets see here, $100K spent on legal fees and $85K reimbursed for legal fees by the insurance company. At the end of the day, you didn't squash the truth and never will.
Mr. Kelley also proceeded to attack my community with Ethnic Slurs and harass my family which precipitated a police report. All of which is sitting on the DA's office in Santa Monica, California. if you think you will win Mr. Kelley you are sadly mistaken, you only win with making a complete fool out of yourself especially when it was found that your complaint had errors and misinformation in it.
Remember Kelley you didn't do your due diligence and verify your client's remarks about "so called" clients and THE REAL reason they stopped their contract to adopt. Which if you recall had nothing to do with me or any other journalist, this was verified by a 3rd party who interviewed the 4 couples who cited "bad customer service" and other "inconsistancies" in the horrible and laughable written complaint that is being laughed at by every law professor on the west coast. Your embarassment after finding these facts were true were evident in your behavior toward me and resorting to personal attacks because you COULD NOT WIN A JUDGMENT.
Keep up the attacking Bennet, you are a low life sleeze only after attorney fees. Which your client paid you handsomely for. What was it that you were paid? Estimates by legal friends say it was $85-100K for legal fees? and what did I have to pay? .......ZERO. Kelley didn't succeed in doing what he set out to do, harm me financially and emotionally. So how much more did the Plaintiff pay you to straighten up her business reputation? You are a paid agitator and have done this for the Democratic party by attacking former President Bush (Bushlies.net) But attacking a solo citizen is unacceptable for your wealthy client. Your client is not a small business as you would have people believe, their IRS revenue reported is $1.3 million for the last 4 years. Adoption Agencies are not exactly without critics these days, as such they have dropped off by 52% the last 4 years for good reasons.
Here is the lie Kelley posted. If he wants to call it a “victory”, he can. Of course, you’re free to categorize it however you want. Plaintiffs easily incurred legal fees and costs in excess of $100k. The mediation alone probably cost them ten grand between attorneys’ fees, the mediator’s fee, hotels, and flights. Surely, Bennet walked away with more money to support his lackluster writing and speaking career. Do you really think bashing private citizens and aligning yourself with a group that is currently under FBI investigation is good for your reputation?
Mr. Kelley you will never stop freedom of speech and the truth, as this was explained to you by Judge Westerfield. Admittedly, your own client admits the arrest and the DISMISSAL BY the former employer, all known and substantiated facts. Again you misled everyone and your communication sucks, I think your own quote "do anything for a buck" suits you well. Your professors from back east would be very ashamed of your lousy tactics and infantile actions. You lose and you have to resort to personal attacks on children and 80 year olds.
Mr. Kelley professes to stand up for Freedom of Speech and applauds "Occupy Wall Street Movement". Unfortunately when it comes to lawyers and mercenaries, they will always side with the paying client as they are a paid mouthpiece puppet. No lawyer can be trusted, so we have to ask Mr. Kelley does he stand on the side of moral virtues or big business and greed? I think we know the answer. Also you profess to defend Spam, yet claim you added a website attacking me for spam filters (whatever that is suppose to mean- Everyone should realize Bennet has a magical way with word salads- after all he is a wanna be writer) Then fail to mention you were paid unsuccessfully by Spam Lobbyists, not to mention your former job as in house counsel for Value Click who have since "parted ways" with you. I understand your late father was an honorable DA in Rhode Island, too bad you have not filled his shoes.
P.S. THIS LATEST BLOG YOU POSTED ABOUT ME IS PROOF, OF YOUR VICIOUS PROSECUTION ATTEMPT AND VEXATOUS MALICIOUS LITIGATION. YOU LOSE AND ARE A LOSER.
Internet Law Center Announces Victory against Serial Cyber Defamer; Calls for Legislative Action
Internet Law Center Announces Victory against Serial Cyber Defamer;
Calls for Legislative Action
SANTA MONICA, CA–Nov. 15, 2011—The Internet Law Center, a law firm based in Santa Monica, California, announced today it had achieved a significant victory for its client Hopscotch Adoptions, Inc. (www.hopscotchadoptions.org) of High Point, North Carolina in a federal defamation action against Vanessa Kachadurian of Fresno, California, with an $85,000 settlement.
Hopscotch and its founder Robin Sizemore, filed suit against Kachadurian in federal court in Fresno in December 2009 in response to a vicious cyber-smear campaign that began in 2006. The plaintiffs were merely one of several adoption and educational institutions to be targeted for abuse by Kachadurian under multiple identities.
“It is a gutsy move for a small non-profit like Hopscotch to say ‘enough’ and take on someone like Kachadurian who can devastate a small business,” said Internet Law Center founder Bennet Kelley. This is especially true when, Kelley added, “cyber abuse often escalates online and leads to offline threats of violence in over one in four cases according to data compiled by WHO@ (www.haltabuse.org).”
“Small victories like these collectively send an important message that the internet is no longer the ‘Wild, Wild West’ and that you can and will be held accountable for your actions.”
Kelley noted, however, that “Kachadurian is part of a growing class of internet serial defamers who cause substantial economic and emotional harm to their victims and who have forced companies to spend millions on online reputation management to block and/or respond to such attacks.”
Kelley, who helped draft a primer on internet law for California policymakers, argued that lawmakers across the country should seriously assess whether their state’s defamation laws need to be updated to address these worst offenders.
Kelley added that, this may be a topic he explores in more depth in a future edition of Cyber Law and Business Report, a radio show he hosts that airs weekly on WebmasterRadio.fm.
About The Internet Law Center
The Internet Law Center (www.internetlawcenter.net) helps clients navigate and influence the evolving legal standards for the changing digital economy. The firm publishes the newsletter, Cyber Report, which won top prize at the Los Angeles Press Club’s 2011 Southern California Journalism Awards.
The firm was founded by Bennet Kelley, the former co-chair of the California Bar Cyberspace Committee, where he led the effort to publish Cyberspace Law and Policy: A Primer for State Policymakers.
Kelley is also Of Counsel to San Diego-based Hull McGuire PC (www.hullmcguire.com) and host of Cyber Law and Business Report which airs every Wednesday at 10AM Pacific/ 1PM Eastern on WebmasterRadio.fm. (www2.webmasterradio.fm/cyberlaw-and-business-report/).
Contact:
Bennet Kelley, (310) 452-0401
bkelley@internetlawcenter.net
