Total Pageviews

Sunday, September 12, 2010

Vanessa Kachadurian-Tulsa Lawyer accused of bilking widow of $1 million plus


Tulsa lawyer accused of bilking widow of $1 million-plus
The woman has filed a lawsuit against the attorney.

Defendant in lawsuit
Jasen Corns: The suit, filed in Tulsa County District Court by Elizabeth Lorene Stambaugh, alleges that Corns persuaded her to pay off his home's nearly $154,000 mortgage and to pay $579,000 for a second home for him. Stambaugh alleges that Corns "wrongfully induced" her to make disbursements out of her trust. Also, her trust was revised to leave Corns 40 percent of its net value upon her death, a change he requested, the suit alleges.
By GAVIN OFF World Data Editor
Published: 9/11/2010 2:24 AM
Last Modified: 9/11/2010 5:53 AM

A Tulsa attorney is accused in a lawsuit of taking more than $1 million in gifts and money from an 88-year-old Tulsa widow he was representing.

The suit, filed Wednesday in Tulsa County District Court by Elizabeth Lorene Stambaugh, alleges that attorney Jasen Corns persuaded Stambaugh to pay off his home's nearly $154,000 mortgage and to pay $579,000 for a second home for him.

Stambaugh alleges in the lawsuit that Corns "wrongfully induced" her to make disbursements out of her trust.

Also, Stambaugh's trust was revised to leave Corns 40 percent of its net value upon her death, a change requested by Corns, the suit alleges.

The suit names Corns and his law firm, Jenks Law.

Corns said he was not involved in the revisions to the trust and was told that he has been removed as a trust beneficiary.

"During his representation of Stambaugh, Corns prevailed on Stambaugh to make various gifts and loans out of her personal funds and the corpus of the Trust, resulting in at least $1,466,233 being distributed out of the Trust and her personal funds to him, his creditors and members of his immediate family," the lawsuit alleges.

Stambaugh's attorney declined to comment.

Corns said he began representing Stambaugh in 2005. He said the money he received from her was for his time working, amounting to 15 to 20 hours a week at a rate of $200 an hour for five years.

Corns said he ended the relationship with Stambaugh in August after she threatened to hurt his family.

"She promised, in recorded messages, to make sure, in her exact words, that my 'reputation was gone,' " Corns said via e-mail. "That is what her frivolous lawsuit is about."

He added: "As for any specific allegations, I deny all of them, other than the fact that she compensated me for my time for more than five years."

Specific allegations include that Stambaugh paid the mortgage of his former home and bought Corns a new one.

According to the suit, Stambaugh tried to get a mortgage from Corns for his former house to secure the nearly $154,000 payment she gave him. But Corns never signed or filed the mortgage or executed a promissory note, the lawsuit states.

"During their relationship, Corns and Jenks Law procured other substantial amounts of money from Stambaugh by the use of actual fraud, and/or other means which were against equity and good conscience toward an elderly person who placed trust and confidence in him," the suit states.

"She has never loaned me any money or bought me a house," Corns said. "I purchased my own home with income I earned, and all records reflect that."

Tulsa County property records show that Corns bought a house in the 5300 block of 94th Court in 2002. In 2004, he took out a $151,200 mortgage and paid it off in 2006. Last year, he sold the house for $171,000 and bought a property in the 4300 block of 118th Street for $579,000, the records show.

"Instead of paying back the aforesaid loan, however, Corns falsely represented to Stambaugh that the house had not sold, and that its new occupants were merely renters," the lawsuit states.

Stambaugh is seeking a judgment of more than $10,000, punitive damages and a constructive trust over the 118th Street property.

The lawsuit also alleges claims of actual and constructive fraud, breach of contract, "money had and received" and professional malpractice.



Gavin Off 732-8106
gavin.off@tulsaworld.com

Read more from this Tulsa World article at http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?subjectid=16&articleid=20100911_11_A15_CUTLIN6416

Saturday, September 11, 2010

Vanessa Kachadurian-Lawyers that play in Rock Bands



Seems there are a lot of lawyers attracted to drugs, sex and rock n roll. Many moonlight and play in bands - maybe to forget the pain they inflict on others or because they have delusions of grandeur. Most that moonlight in rock bands are losers and tend to be short in height and feel miserable about themselves. They look down on others as if they are better than them and associate with questionable people.
Lawyers Rock to the Beat of Their Own Drummer

Lemonhead-turned-lawyer jams at attorney-owned coffeehouse as both reprise musical past

Janet L. Conley
Fulton County Daily Report
June 16, 2008

If you dropped by Kavarna, a hip coffeehouse and music venue in Decatur, Ga., this past Saturday night, you probably saw two lawyers who love music taking center stage, each in his own way.

Behind the soundboard you saw Wystan Getz, a Decatur criminal defense attorney who owns Kavarna and serves as its sound engineer a couple of nights a week; at the mic you saw John Strohm, who once played drums and guitar with indie rock bands Blake Babies and the Lemonheads and who's now an entertainment lawyer in Birmingham, Ala.

Both Getz and Strohm, who met recently via MySpace, have found a way to mix their first love -- music -- with their day jobs in law.

For Getz, law practice isn't just a way to keep his hand in the restaurant business. It's a way to do what he believes in. And it's clear from the moment you walk into his law office that he's comfortable expressing his views. On his waiting room coffee table, you'll see a copy of High Times, where he advertises his practice, next to the Fulton County Daily Report and the music magazine Paste.

The former Rockdale County assistant public defender who self-identifies on his Web site as "marijuana defender" divides his time between his practice, which focuses on criminal defense work including DUIs and drug cases, and stop-in-for-a-latte-and-stay-for-the-show Kavarna.

JAVA JOINT

Kavarna got its start when Getz purchased an existing business in February 2007 and grew it from a morning java joint into a day-to-night coffee-and-wine bar offering sandwiches, small plates and, three nights a week, live music.

His wife, Jill Wasserman, a King & Spalding attorney, helps him with music-licensing issues that arise, and his own legal and entrepreneurial skills help him spot not just dram shop liability and employment law issues, they also help him handle organization, multitasking and -- believe it or not -- customer service.

"Being an attorney is, essentially, providing personal services to people, and that's what this business is, too," he said. "We're providing personal services -- although in the form of refreshments and entertainment rather than solving crises. In a lot of ways, it's the same."

He has an ex-Aurora Coffee manager running Kavarna, but acknowledged that the food-and-drinks business is taking up more and more of his time these days -- about 60 percent compared with the 40 percent he spends practicing law.

Getz, who plays the guitar, keyboard, oboe and English horn but hasn't performed publicly in some time because of a tremor that makes playing difficult, said one of his motivations for launching Kavarna was to stay close to his musical roots.

"I think that for me, that's some of the interest in this business," he said. "And it doesn't matter that my fingering technique is not that good anymore."

Instead, he handles sound engineering for the musicians he books. And he books musicians he likes -- including Strohm, who now practices at Johnston Barton Proctor & Rose in Birmingham, but who spent the 1990s rocking out with some of the country's most popular indie bands at the time. Strohm co-founded Blake Babies with Juliana Hatfield, now a noted solo artist; his then-girlfriend, Freda Boner, was the drummer. He later played drums and guitar and toured with the pop-punk band the Lemonheads and its lead singer, Evan Dando, performing on two of the group's albums, "Creator" (1988) and "Lovey" (1990).

LISTENED AS STUDENT

Getz, who's from Nashville, said he liked Strohm's music for years and began listening to it while a student at Williams College in Massachusetts. Strohm, for part of that time, was a student at Berklee College of Music in Boston and was an integral part of the Boston music scene Getz enjoyed.

The two never met during their New England days, but Getz said he knew Strohm had become a lawyer and sent him a message via his MySpace page recently to see if he'd play at Kavarna.

Strohm said yes.

In an interview from his office in Birmingham, Strohm said he rarely plays in public these days, doing what he calls "proper shows" only a few times a year.

The demands of a law practice and a young family -- he's an associate at Johnston Barton and the father of a 5-year-old and a 7-month-old -- keep him close to home most nights.

But he still keeps both hands in the music business. In 2007, he released a solo album called "Everyday Life" on the Superphonic Records label; music business contacts he made as a performer, he said, are what help him get clients now.

"The reason I'm able to attract clients is because I have this depth of experience on the artist side," he said. "All my work comes through word of mouth. It's very nichey. I have friends and contacts in the industry who talk me up."

'DAY JOB WENT AWAY'

But his role in that industry underwent a dramatic change in 1997. That's when the Lemonheads broke up. "What was essentially my day job went away," he said.

Strohm followed the woman who'd become his wife back to her hometown in Birmingham, where she'd landed a job in banking. He began looking for work, too, but there wasn't much available for a guy with experience as a touring musician and studio sound engineer.

"It was really a cold shot of reality, because I realized I just wasn't equipped to make a living unless I was traveling. I had an enormous amount of arcane knowledge and skills that were not useful in the job market," he says.

So, in his 20s, he went back to college and got a history degree with a music minor from the University of Alabama-Birmingham, then went on to graduate magna cum laude from Cumberland School of Law in 2004.

An Atlanta entertainment lawyer -- sole practitioner David Prasse, who'd represented Strohm when he was performing -- encouraged him to get into the legal side of the music business.

"That really meant a lot," Strohm said.

Prasse, who counts Mastodon -- named best metal band by Rolling Stone magazine in April -- and bluegrass band Act of Congress among his clients, said he'd done some record deals with Strohm and noticed that the musician "had an eye for the players in the industry who were good to work with and who to stay away from."

Also, he added, "I thought John Strohm had the intelligence and personality and experience to be a music attorney who could really help a lot of people."

Strohm started out practicing law at Bradley Arant in Birmingham, then moved to Johnston Barton where he represents a variety of indie rock bands, including Montreal, which rocker Kevin Barnes founded in Athens, Ga., in the 1990s.

Strohm said he had moments in law school where he thought, "Where am I? What am I doing? Have I completely screwed this up?"

But now he has no plans -- or desire -- to return to full-time performing. In his last few years as a rocker, he said, he felt a lot of anxiety because he really wanted a family but knew a music career wouldn't provide the stability they'd need. Real music careers are stressful, he said.

"I wanted to be involved with music but not sweat bullets like that," he said.

STABILITY

Law practice offers that involvement without the instability. "If one of my solo albums freakishly took off and did really well, that would cause a lot of problems for me," he added, pointing out that it is hard to take a family on tour. "My kids are used to seeing me every day ... they hate it when I leave town."

"Would I give up my practice at age 41? I doubt it."

Getz, too, says he doesn't plan to ditch his criminal defense practice and become a full-time restaurateur.

Getz -- whose most memorable cases include helping The Innocence Project use DNA evidence to exonerate Clarence Harrison in 2004 for an erroneous rape conviction and representing William J. Kollie, an armed robber who was slapped with seven consecutive life sentences, the longest in Georgia history -- said Kavarna helps him keep perspective on the stress his law practice creates, and vice versa.

"It's nice to have a little bit of diversity going on," he said.

Vanessa Kachadurian: Georgia Tann or Edna Gladney?

Vanessa Kachadurian: Georgia Tann or Edna Gladney?: "Edna Gladney or Georgia Tann? To understand the 2007 legislative efforts in Texas with HB525/SB221 in the light of US adoption histo..."

Friday, September 10, 2010

Vanessa Kachadurian-Corrupt and Crazy Attorneys



Poor Catherine Shelton, first a murder trial where she is disbarred, then a shoplifting case.
Former Dallas lawyer Catherine Shelton gets probation for shoplifting

12:00 AM CST on Saturday, January 17, 2009

By JENNIFER EMILY / The Dallas Morning News
jemily@dallasnews.com

A disbarred Dallas defense lawyer with a long history of questionable ethical and criminal conduct – including as a murder suspect – was sentenced Friday to probation for shoplifting.


Former lawyer Catherine Shelton has had a series of run-ins with the law. Catherine Shelton, 60, pleaded guilty in exchange for three years' probation. She will serve a two-year prison sentence if she violates her probation, which will be moved to Harris County, where she lives.

State District Judge Michael Snipes told Shelton that he felt sorry for her but that she had brought shame and discredit to the legal community.

"Mendacity, cunning and guile have been your moral compass," the judge told her as she stood before him after showing up to the hearing more than 30 minutes late.

Shelton wore a tan trench coat and black loafers as she testified briefly in a soft voice. She asked that Snipes defer her sentence so she would not have a theft conviction if she completed her probation. Snipes denied her request.

Her sentence stems from a November 2007 arrest in which she was accused of shoplifting a $1,195 Marc Jacobs purse, two shirts worth $326 and an $8 candle from the Nordstrom store at NorthPark Center.

"I was apparently seeking to carry everything that I could," she testified about the day she tried to steal from Nordstrom. "I was under an enormous amount of stress at the time. I failed to live up to the very high standards of the world."

She testified that she is working for $8.50 an hour and is in a government computer training program. She also is undergoing psychiatric care.

"I'm doing a lot better," she told the court.

Shelton told Snipes that she wanted to live "a quiet, unobserved life" in Houston.

She declined to comment after the hearing, whispering "please don't."

This is not the first time Shelton has been in trouble. And her brushes with the law have been the subject of many news stories and were profiled in national television programs.

She was suspected but never charged in the December 1999 shooting death of her office manager's husband, Michael Hierro. Clint Shelton, her husband, is serving a life sentence for the crime.

Marissa Hierro, the office manager, filed and then dropped a wrongful-death lawsuit against Shelton over her husband's death.

Shelton also faced a wrongful-death lawsuit in 1980 when her former lover, a Houston anesthesiologist, was bludgeoned to death in his garage. Shelton was suing him for divorce at the time, arguing that they had a common-law marriage and that she was pregnant. He was found dead the day they were to appear in court.

The lawsuit, filed by the doctor's estate, alleged that Shelton and one of her former clients conspired to murder the doctor. That suit also was dropped.

Shelton later was convicted of aggravated assault for shooting a former boyfriend. She also was convicted of assaulting a pregnant former friend.

She also has faced numerous complaints from legal clients and has been disbarred twice. But those disbarments were reversed, and her license was reinstated – once because she was not properly notified about a hearing and another time because paperwork was missing.

She lost her law license in May because she was a no-show at two hearings while serving three years' probation for misrepresenting herself as an immigration lawyer.

The suspension ends in 2010. But Shelton testified Thursday that she could not imagine seeking to reinstate her law license when her suspension expires.

"I don't even think about that anymore," she told the judge

Vanessa Kachadurian-Will the State Bar Ever make Attorney's accountable?


http://www.open.salon.com/blog/bonnie_russell/2010/09/01/will_state_bars_ever_make_attorneys_accountabilty_can_they

Read this excellent article about how the California State Bar Association which is really a trade organization is overseen by fellow attorneys. Isn't this a bit like the fox watching the hen house?

Shouldn't the California State Bar Association be over seen by a seperate ethical entity? My suggestion is retired or inactive lawyers or those that have a JD but no Bar license.

Monday, September 6, 2010

Vanessa Kachadurian - Malicious Prosecution




An action for damages brought by one against whom a civil suit or criminal proceeding has been unsuccessfully commenced without PROBABLE CAUSE and for a purpose other than that of bringing the alleged offender to justice.

An action for malicious prosecution is the remedy for baseless and malicious litigation. It is not limited to criminal prosecutions but may be brought in response to any baseless and malicious litigation or prosecution, whether criminal or civil. The criminal defendant or civil respondent in a baseless and malicious case may later file this claim in civil court against the parties who took an active role in initiating or encouraging the original case. The defendant in the initial case becomes the plaintiff in the malicious prosecution suit, and the plaintiff or prosecutor in the original case becomes the defendant. In most states the claim must be filed within a year after the end of the original case.

A claim of malicious prosecution is a tort action. A TORT action is filed in civil court to recover money damages for certain harm suffered. The plaintiff in a malicious prosecution suit seeks to win money from the respondent as recompense for the various costs associated with having to defend against the baseless and vexatious case.



Read more: Malicious Prosecution - Elements Of Proof, Damages, Other Considerations, Further Readings - Action, False, Civil, Arrest, Criminal, and Baseless http://law.jrank.org/pages/8407/Malicious-Prosecution.html#ixzz0yjI0zca9

Saturday, September 4, 2010

Vanessa Kachadurian Best Lawyer Story of the Year!!


Subject: FW: BEST LAWYER STORY OF THE YEAR - Only in America

BEST LAWYER STORY OF THE YEAR, DECADE AND PROBABLY THE CENTURY!!

Charlotte, North Carolina. USA.

A lawyer purchased a box of very rare and expensive cigars, then insured them against, among other things, fire. Within a month, having smoked his entire stockpile of these great cigars and without yet having made even his first premium payment on the policy, the lawyer filed a claim against the insurance company.

In his claim, the lawyer stated the cigars were lost 'in a series of small fires.' The insurance company refused to pay, citing the obvious reason, that the man had consumed the cigars in the normal fashion. The lawyer sued.. and WON!

(Stay with me.)

Delivering the ruling, the judge agreed with the insurance company that the claim was frivolous. The judge stated nevertheless, that the lawyer held a policy from the company, which it had warranted that the cigars were insurable and also guaranteed that it would insure them against fire, without defining what is considered to be unacceptable fire' and was obligated to pay the claim!

Rather than endure lengthy and costly appeal process, the insurance company accepted the ruling and paid $15,000 to the lawyer for his loss of the cigars lost in the 'fires'.

NOW, FOR THE BEST PART

After the lawyer cashed the check, the insurance company had him arrested on 24 counts of ARSON!!!

With his own insurance claim and testimony from the previous case being used against him, the lawyer was convicted of intentionally burning his insured property and was sentenced to 24 months in jail and a $24,000 fine. This is a true story and was the First Place winner in the recent Criminal Lawyers Award Contest!

ONLY IN AMERICA!