Vanessa Kachadurian, Supreme Court ruling on spam, bad news for spam marketers

Since you have written in the past on issues regarding spamming, I wanted to make you aware of some great news. The United States Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge to a California appellate court ruling in Balsam v. Trancos Inc., which ruled that email marketing company Trancos Inc. violated the state’s anti-spamming law. This ends the company’s attempt to argue the statute was preempted by federal law and further empowers people to protect their inboxes from those who deliberately falsify email headers with intent to mislead or hide from complaints against them. The Balsam v. Trancos case is the most recent of several published opinions I have achieved on behalf of email recipients seeking to have spammers comply with current law. *The United States Supreme Court designation for denial of the petition of certiorari is Trancos Inc. v. Daniel L. Balsam, case number 12-237 (October 29, 2012). The original appellate court decision is Balsam v. Trancos Inc. (2012) 203 Cal. App. 4th 1083. http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=4942428848946702426&q=balsam+v.+trancos&hl=en&as_sdt=2,5 -- Timothy J. Waltonhttp://www.timothywalton.com From a friend that is the top Internet Attorney in the USA. A victory against the spam marketers and their shit head attorneys that feel they have the right to pollute our inboxes. You lose again!!!