Total Pageviews

Thursday, December 9, 2010

Vanessa Kachadurian-Congrats to Anti-Spam Attorney Dan Balsam



Bravo to Attorney Dan Balsam. That "Spam lobbyist Attorney" is a clown and disliked by everyone for his arrogant behavior. To cyber squat and steal someone’s web site, their name, the seal of the federal court plus photo of the defendant is unethical. Why did Batman do this stupid and unlawful behavior? “I did it on a lark to tweek him” what an ass clown.

http://directmag.com/magilla/0811-balsam-kelley-dan-hate-spam/
Featured on Fox News
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/12/27/man-makes-living-suing-spammers/?test=latestnews#content
http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/26184891/vp/40862269#40862269

This one is filed under “lawyer self-promotion” or is it trying to reach rock star / lawyer status? Gotta love the self love.

http://www.kizoa.com/slideshow/d875212k3656837o1/who-is-bgk

Sophisticated Litigation Support Blog
Posted at 1:34 PM on March 18, 2010 by David Kaufer
San Francisco attorney awarded thousands in spam suit
Source: Associated Press
SAN FRANCISCO — A San Francisco attorney has been awarded $7,000 in damages for e-mail spam sent to his inbox.
A San Mateo County Superior Court judge ruled last week the seven e-mails Daniel Balsam received from Redwood City-based Trancos Inc. in 2007 were misleading and violated California's 2004 anti-spam law. Trancos is an Internet advertising business.
The law prohibits sending an unsolicited commercial e-mail that misrepresents the source or subject.
Trancos's attorney, Robert Nelson, said only someone who suffers losses as a result of the e-mail message can sue under the state's anti-spam law.
He says Trancos will appeal the ruling.
Lawyers on both sides of Balsam's case said it appeared to be among the first lawsuits by a consumer under the state's anti-spam law to be tried outside small claims court.

No comments:

Post a Comment